EFFECT OF FOAMING AGENT CONCENTRATION, AERATION INTENSITY, AND AQUEOUS PHASE COMPOSITION ON THE GAS-DISPERSION CHARACTERISTICS OF A FLOTATION SYSTEM

Main Article Content

Shakarov, T.I.
Pulatov, H.A.
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5614-1642

Abstract

The combined effects of frother concentration, air flow rate, and aqueous-phase composition on froth-layer formation and mean bubble diameter in model flotation systems were investigated. In the first series of experiments, T-92 solutions with concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 0.010% were aerated at flow rates of 84.8, 138.0, and 328.8 cm³/min. The maximum froth height, froth formation time, and froth decay time were determined. In the second series, the concentration dependence of the Sauter mean bubble diameter (d₃₂) was evaluated for T-92, PF-1304, and DF-1012 frothers in distilled and tap water. A nonlinear enhancement of the frothing performance of T-92 was observed with the simultaneous increase in frother concentration and air flow rate. At an air flow rate of 328.8 cm³/min, increasing the T-92 concentration from 0.001 to 0.010% increased the froth height from 7 to 35 mm, the froth formation time from 5 to 40 s, and the froth decay time from 6 to 20 s. For T-92, PF-1304, and DF-1012, increasing the frother concentration resulted in a decrease in d₃₂. At a concentration of 0.03 mg/L, the d₃₂ values in tap water were 2.40, 2.07, and 1.99 mm, whereas those in distilled water were 1.98, 0.91, and 0.89 mm for T-92, PF-1304, and DF-1012, respectively. The results demonstrate that frother performance depends on water composition and cannot be explained solely by the total concentration of dissolved salts. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the combined quantitative assessment of the effects of air flow rate and water composition on froth formation and bubble size. To optimize the flotation process, it is recommended to control the frother dosage, the ionic composition of the process water, and the actual air flow rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Mining, Metallurgy, and Manufacturing Industry

Author Biographies

Shakarov, T.I., Olmaliq shahridagi “MISIS” Milliy tadqiqot texnologik universiteti filiali

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Metallurgy of Ferrous, Non-Ferrous and Rare Metals, Almalyk Branch of NUST MISIS, Almalyk, Uzbekistan

Pulatov, H.A., Almalyk Branch of NUST MISIS

Assistant, Department of Metallurgy of Ferrous, Non-Ferrous and Rare Metals, Almalyk Branch of NUST MISIS, Almalyk, Uzbekistan

How to Cite

Shakarov, T. I., & Pulatov, H. A. (2026). EFFECT OF FOAMING AGENT CONCENTRATION, AERATION INTENSITY, AND AQUEOUS PHASE COMPOSITION ON THE GAS-DISPERSION CHARACTERISTICS OF A FLOTATION SYSTEM. Digital Technologies in Industry, 4(3), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.70769/3030-3214.SRT.4.3.2026.26

References

[1] Wang, J., Forbes, G., & Forbes, E. (2022). Frother characterization using a novel bubble size measurement technique. Applied Sciences, 12(2), 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020750

[2] Saavedra Moreno, Y., Bournival, G., & Ata, S. (2022). Classification of flotation frothers—A statistical approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 248, 117252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117252

[3] Karakashev, S. I., Grozev, N. A., Ozdemir, O., Batjargal, K., Guven, O., Ata, S., Bournival, G., Boylu, F., & Çelik, M. S. (2021). On the frother’s strength and its performance. Minerals Engineering, 171, 107093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107093

[4] Pan, Y., Bournival, G., & Ata, S. (2021). The role of non-frothing reagents on bubble size and bubble stability. Minerals Engineering, 161, 106652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106652

[5] Pan, Y., Bournival, G., & Ata, S. (2022). Foaming behaviour of frothers in the presence of PAX and salt. Minerals Engineering, 178, 107405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107405

[6] Pan, Y., Gresham, I., Bournival, G., Prescott, S., & Ata, S. (2022). Synergistic effects of frothers, collector and salt on bubble stability. Powder Technology, 397, 117028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.117028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.117028

[7] Pan, Y., Bournival, G., Karakashev, S. I., Yang, B., Wang, L., & Ata, S. (2022). Effect of electrolyte and flotation collector on foam films in the presence of frothers. Chemical Engineering Science, 264, 118176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.118176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.118176

[8] October, L. L., Manono, M. S., Wiese, J. G., Schreithofer, N., & Corin, K. C. (2021). Fundamental and flotation techniques assessing the effect of water quality on bubble-particle attachment of chalcopyrite and galena. Minerals Engineering, 167, 106880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106880

[9] Manono, M. S., & Corin, K. C. (2022). Considering specific ion effects on froth stability in sulfidic Cu-Ni-PGM ore flotation. Minerals, 12(3), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min12030321

[10] Gungoren, C., Muse, S. M., Terzi, M., Eskibalci, M. F., Kursun Unver, I., & Ozdemir, O. (2023). Synergistic effect of frequently found ions in the flotation of Pb-Zn sulfide ores on air/water interface. Minerals, 13(10), 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13101236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min13101236

[11] Абрамов, А. А. (2008). Флотационные методы обогащения: Учебник для вузов (3-е изд., перераб. и доп., Т. IV). МГГУ.

[12] Шакаров, Т. И., & Хасанов, А. С. (2025). Фойдали қазилмаларни бойитиш ва қайта ишлаш асослари: Олий ўқув юртлари учун дарслик. «Муҳаррир» нашриёти.

Most read articles by the same author(s)