ASSESSMENT OF HEAT STRESS AMONG FOUNDRY WORKERS AND JUSTIFICATION OF WORK–REST REGIMENS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to link heat stress assessment in foundry production to the operations performed and conditions in rest areas, and to establish a quantitative basis for selecting work–rest regimens. The methods included a targeted literature review, comparison of published aggregate data, and deterministic scenario calculations for 36 combinations. Published mean wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) values were plotted with their standard deviations, while the outcomes of measures to reduce heat exposure were compared separately. The calculations assumed work-area WBGT values of 32, 34, and 36 °C, rest-area values of 24, 27, and 29 °C, and rest periods of 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes per hour. The calculated mean WBGT values ranged from 26.67 to 34.83 °C. With 30 minutes per hour allocated to rest, reducing rest-area WBGT from 29 to 24 °C lowered the mean index by 2.50 °C. The results demonstrate the need to consider both the duration and conditions of rest. The article is based on secondary analysis of published data and scenario calculations; no new workplace measurement results are presented.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public License Terms
(For Open Journal Systems (OJS))
-
Copyright:
The copyright of the published article remains with the author(s). However, after publication, the article is distributed on the OJS platform under the Creative Commons (CC BY) license. -
License Type:
This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This means users can utilize the article under the following conditions:- Copy and distribute: The text of the article or its parts can be freely distributed.
- Quote and analyze: Parts of the article can be used for quoting and analysis.
- Free use: The article can be freely used for research and educational purposes.
- Attribution: Users must provide proper attribution and reference to the original source.
-
Commercial use:
The article can be used for commercial purposes, provided that authorship and source are properly cited. -
Document modification:
The text or content of the article can be modified or adapted, as long as it does not harm the authorship. -
Liability disclaimer:
The author(s) are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in the article. The editorial team of the platform is not liable for any damages resulting from the use of this information. -
Public usage obligations:
The content of the article must be used only in accordance with legal and ethical standards. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Note:
These license terms are designed to ensure transparency and openness in material usage. By accepting these terms, you agree to the adaptation and distribution of the article content under the terms of the Creative Commons license.
Link: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
How to Cite
References
[1] Лазаренков, А. М. (2022). Условия труда на рабочих местах заливщиков металла. Литье и металлургия, (1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.21122/1683-6065-2022-1-130-134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21122/1683-6065-2022-1-130-134
[2] Chen, W.-Y., Lo, C.-L., Chen, C.-P., Juang, Y.-J., Yoon, C., & Tsai, P.-J. (2014). Prioritizing factors associated with thermal stresses imposed on workers in steel and iron casting industries using the Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. Journal of Occupational Health, 56(6), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.14-0078-FS DOI: https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.14-0078-FS
[3] Giahi, O., Darvishi, E., Aliabadi, M., & Khoubi, J. (2016). The efficacy of radiant heat controls on workers’ heat stress around the blast furnace of a steel industry. Work, 53(2), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-152104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-152104
[4] International Organization for Standardization. (2023). Ergonomics of the thermal environment—Analytical determination and interpretation of heat stress using calculation of the predicted heat strain (ISO Standard No. 7933:2023). https://www.iso.org/standard/78240.html
[5] Lazarenkov, A. M., Ivanov, I. A., Sadoha, M. A., Narziev, Sh. M., & Jumanazarov, S. S. (2024). Impact of production environment and labor process factors on the body of foundry workers. Science and Innovation, 3(A4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11079174
[6] Lazarenkov, A. M., & Narziev, Sh. M. (2025). Working conditions of employees in electroplating shops. Oscar Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(12), 83–88. https://oscarpubhouse.net/index.php/ojast/article/view/218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/ajast/Volume05Issue12-13
[7] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2016). Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to heat and hot environments (DHHS [NIOSH] Publication No. 2016-106). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-106/pdfs/2016-106.pdf
[8] Norloei, S., Jafari, M. J., Omidi, L., Khodakarim, S., Bashash, D., Abdollahi, M. B., & Jafari, M. (2017). The effects of heat stress on a number of hematological parameters and levels of thyroid hormones in foundry workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 23(4), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1246122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1246122
[9] Sharma, M., Alam, M. S., Sharma, K., & Kataria, K. K. (2025). Assessing implications of occupational heat stress on the physiological and productive attributes of small-scale foundry workers in Northern India. Work, 82(3), 682–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241289664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241289664